Less repeated paperwork.
Clearer verification.
Help an authorised reviewer find missing, expired or inconsistent evidence sooner. Police clearance remains an authoritative decision.
View the pilot proposal ↗One evidence profile. Separate decisions.
Record document status, verification source, expiry and operating jurisdiction. Customer service ratings remain separate from identity verification. State of origin is never used to infer criminality or threat.
What is implemented
Local document triage flags missing or unreadable evidence. Mock extraction cannot approve a driver, and phone-supplied face-verification flags cannot grant approval.
What the pilot would add
Authorised document-provider checks, assisted extraction and an agreed checklist for each operating jurisdiction. The authority defines the requirements and the approval process.
A readiness review, not a threat score.
Try fictional evidence states. This example uses no personal data and does not perform police verification.
A pilot the teams can evaluate.
We are seeking an opportunity to evaluate VV with Bharat Taxi and nominated police stations. No partnership is claimed. The operator provides a technical lead; the authority defines coverage and verification sources; VV supports integration and reports the results.
Proposed scope: one operator and up to 10 stations, subject to agreement. Compare document-review time and repeat requests against a baseline, alongside journey handover and alert-quality measures.
Discuss the pilot ↗